Tuesday, February 28, 2006
Saturday, February 25, 2006
Thursday, February 23, 2006
Wednesday, February 22, 2006
Tuesday, February 21, 2006
Thursday, February 16, 2006
Tuesday, February 14, 2006
Monday, February 13, 2006
This was my reaction, and I think the reaction of the most politically savy Texans upon hearing about Deadeye Dick Cheneys little mishap with a shotgun. The history of the Texas Armstrong family will be the most underreported aspect of this story, including its politically influencial daughter-in-law, Anne, and the relationship between the Armstrong family and the Bush Crime Family. There is also the related story of Bush’s other hunting companion, close friend and confidant, William Will Stamps Farish III, whose family has ties to companies that helped sponsor the Nazis. The Bushes have an annual hunt on the Farish’s Beeville, Texas ranch.
Sydney Blumenthal wrote the following in his column, Shoot First, Avoid Questions Later:
Katharine Armstrong is linked to two family fortunes those of Armstrong and King that include extensive corporate holdings in land, cattle, banking and oil. No one in Texas, except perhaps Baker, but certainly not latecomer George W. Bush, has a longer lineage in its political and economic elite. In 1983, Debretts Peerage Ltd., publisher of Debretts Peerage and Baronetage, printed Debrett's Texas Peerage, featuring the aristocrats of Texas, with the King family noted as the Royal Family of Ranching. The King Ranch, founded by Richard King in 1857, is the largest in Texas, and its wealth was vastly augmented by the discovery of oil on its tracts, making the family a major shareholder of Exxon. The King Ranch is the model for Edna Ferbers novel of Texas aristocracy, Giant.
John B. Armstrong, a Texas Ranger and enforcer for the King Ranch, founded his own neighboring ranch in 1882, buying it with the bounty of $4,000 he got for capturing the outlaw John Wesley Hardin. In 1944, almost inevitably, the two fortunes became intertwined through marriage. Tobin Armstrongs brother John married the King Ranch heiress, who was also a Vassar classmate of Tobins wife, Anne, who came from a wealthy New Orleans family....
While the incident continues to unfold, the Bush administration is pressing a new budget in which oil companies would receive what is called royalty relief, allowing them to pump about $65 billion of oil and natural gas from federal land over the next five years without paying any royalties to the government, costing the U.S. Treasury about $7 billion. For Texas royalty like the Armstrongs, it would amount to a windfall profit.
The curiosities surrounding the vice president's accident have created a contemporary version of The Rules of the Game with a Texas twist. In Jean Renoirs 1939 film, politicians and aristocrats mingle at a country house in France over a long weekend, during which a merciless hunt ends with a tragic shooting. Appearing on the eve of World War II, The Rules of the Game depicted a hypocritical, ruthless and decadent ruling class that made its own rules and led a society to the edge of catastrophe.
Saturday, February 11, 2006
Thursday, February 09, 2006
Tuesday, February 07, 2006
Monday, February 06, 2006
Muslims have been staging demonstrations against some cartoons, first published in a Denmark newspaper last September. The allegedly sacrilegious editorial cartoons have been republished in other newspapers since then, and in recent weeks, to show support for freedom of speech and freedom of the press.
Please note one of those demonstrations in particular. Thursday, Muslim religious students in Multan, Pakistan burned an effigy of Denmarks Prime Minister Andres Fogh Rasmussen (Associated Press wire photo published Friday, February 3, 2006).
Whats wrong with this picture?
First, Muslims interpret Muhammads teachings as strictly prohibiting any depictions of humans or animals. If pictures of the Prophet Muhammad are strictly forbidden, how do Muslims know when he is being depicted? If they accept such a picture as a blasphemous image of their holy leader, they themselves are committing the sacrilege they despise. They somehow believe it is Muhammads image, and believe the image to be sacred which is idolatry.
Second, Islams prohibition against images of people (in this case their beloved prophet) is reportedly the main reason for their anti-cartoon protests. It is blasphemy (not to mention hypocrisy), therefore, for Muslim religious students to create an effigy.
Third, the demonstrators are posing for the cameras (still and video), instead of repelling the infidel photographers. By posing, each protester is a co-creator of his own forbidden portrait.
Some government leaders in Muslim countries are also wondering about these so-called protests. A report on National Public Radios Morning Edition, Monday, noted that officials intend to investigate the possible influence of outside (read U.S.) Intelligence behind the demonstrations.